MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Jakub Paul [326th] vs Domagoj Biljesko [882nd] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head To Head: Paul 1 - 0 Biljesko

They have played 2 sets in total, with Paul winning 2 and Biljesko winning 0. The last match between Paul and Biljesko was at the M25 Kiseljak, 31-05-2022, First, Clay with Jakub Paul getting the victory 6-4 6-1.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Jakub Paul 1
Domagoj Biljesko 0
Paul vs Biljesko H2H Profile
Paul Stats Biljesko
67% (18-9) YTD Win/Loss 0% (0-0)
1 Head-to-Head 0
326 Ranking 882
326 Highest Rank 751
26 Age 27
R Plays -
5 Titles 0
56% (222-172) Career Total W/L 53% (210-186)
$2,285 Career Prize Money $0
1 Clay H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Paul VS Biljesko H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-4 6-1
cross
Jakub Paul
Player
Domagoj Biljesko
67% ( 33 of 49)
1st Serve %
67% ( 42 of 63)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
67% ( 22 of 33)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 21 of 42)
63% ( 10 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 10 of 21)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
35% ( 17 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 32 of 63)
64
Total Points Won
48

Paul VS Biljesko H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Paul Vs Biljesko H2H Stats
Jakub Paul Paul Stats Domagoj Biljesko Biljesko
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 0
12 Games Won 5
0 Aces (Total) 1
1 Total Double Faults 4
1:21:0 Average Match Time 1:21:0
67% (33/49) 1st Serve % 67% (42/63)
67% (22/33) 1st Serve Win % 50% (21/42)
63% (10/16) 2nd Serve Win % 48% (10/21)
45% (5/11) Break Points Won % (Total) 50% (1/2)
51% (32/63) Return Points Win % 35% (17/49)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Jakub Paul vs Domagoj Biljesko Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Paul 1 - 0 Biljesko

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul has won 45.27% of points on their second serve, while Biljesko has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul, in recent form, has won 46.82% of their opponent's second serve points, while Biljesko has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.12% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Paul has saved 55.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Biljesko has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Paul has won 64.47% of matches played (W/L 49/ 27), with Biljesko winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Paul has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 77/ 42), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 45/ 40). Biljesko has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 37/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8).
  • Player level: In the last year, Paul has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.07% of matches (W/L 37/ 19), where as Biljesko has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 3/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paul winning 1 times and Biljesko being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Paul winning 2 and Biljesko winning 0. The last match between Paul and Biljesko was at the M25 Kiseljak, 31-05-2022, First, Clay with Jakub Paul getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Paul and Biljesko have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paul winning 0 times and Biljesko 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paul winning 0, and Biljesko 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul has played against opponents with an average rank of 340.92 while Biljesko has played against players with an average rank of 250.67.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Biljesko has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul has converted 30.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Biljesko has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Jakub Paul Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R1
    cross
    Pablo Carreno-Busta
    Player
    Jakub Paul
    51% ( 27 of 53)
    1st Serve %
    71% ( 27 of 38)
    3
    Aces
    0
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    67% ( 18 of 27)
    1st Serve Won
    41% ( 11 of 27)
    62% ( 16 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    27% ( 3 of 11)
    100% ( 5 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    36% ( 19 of 53)
    Rtn Points Won
    63% ( 24 of 38)
    58
    Total Points Won
    33
    L
    6-2 6-1 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Jakub Paul
    Player
    Pedro Cachin
    61% ( 49 of 80)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 46 of 73)
    3
    Aces
    7
    2
    Double Faults
    5
    63% ( 31 of 49)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 32 of 46)
    58% ( 18 of 31)
    2nd Serve Won
    37% ( 10 of 27)
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    39% ( 31 of 80)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 31 of 73)
    80
    Total Points Won
    73
    W
    7-6(6) 6-3 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Jakub Paul
    Player
    Nikoloz Basilashvili
    68% ( 63 of 93)
    1st Serve %
    51% ( 38 of 75)
    2
    Aces
    5
    3
    Double Faults
    5
    65% ( 41 of 63)
    1st Serve Won
    53% ( 20 of 38)
    50% ( 15 of 30)
    2nd Serve Won
    57% ( 21 of 37)
    33% ( 5 of 15)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    40% ( 37 of 93)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 34 of 75)
    90
    Total Points Won
    78
    W
    4-6 6-1 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Jurij Rodionov
    Player
    Jakub Paul
    63% ( 27 of 43)
    1st Serve %
    64% ( 38 of 59)
    0
    Aces
    3
    0
    Double Faults
    2
    78% ( 21 of 27)
    1st Serve Won
    53% ( 20 of 38)
    69% ( 11 of 16)
    2nd Serve Won
    52% ( 11 of 21)
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    26% ( 11 of 43)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 28 of 59)
    60
    Total Points Won
    42
    L
    6-2 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Jurij Rodionov
    Player
    Jakub Paul
    60% ( 27 of 45)
    1st Serve %
    70% ( 39 of 56)
    3
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    1
    81% ( 22 of 27)
    1st Serve Won
    54% ( 21 of 39)
    61% ( 11 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    35% ( 6 of 17)
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    27% ( 12 of 45)
    Rtn Points Won
    52% ( 29 of 56)
    62
    Total Points Won
    39
    L
    6-3 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Jakub Paul
    Player
    Alexander Blockx
    61% ( 40 of 66)
    1st Serve %
    61% ( 41 of 67)
    2
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    80% ( 32 of 40)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 26 of 41)
    42% ( 11 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    42% ( 11 of 26)
    30% ( 3 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    35% ( 23 of 66)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 30 of 67)
    73
    Total Points Won
    60
    W
    6-1 7-6(5) H2H
    QF
    cross
    Jakub Paul
    Player
    Michael Agwi
    65% ( 77 of 119)
    1st Serve %
    69% ( 82 of 118)
    1
    Aces
    8
    4
    Double Faults
    4
    66% ( 51 of 77)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 56 of 82)
    50% ( 21 of 42)
    2nd Serve Won
    39% ( 14 of 36)
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 3 of 12)
    39% ( 47 of 119)
    Rtn Points Won
    41% ( 48 of 118)
    120
    Total Points Won
    117
    W
    7-5 6-7(3) 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Jakub Paul
    Player
    Lucas Marionneau
    69% ( 38 of 55)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 39 of 71)
    1
    Aces
    2
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    66% ( 25 of 38)
    1st Serve Won
    59% ( 23 of 39)
    76% ( 13 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 14 of 32)
    29% ( 4 of 14)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    31% ( 17 of 55)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 34 of 71)
    72
    Total Points Won
    54
    W
    6-4 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Dino Prizmic
    Player
    Jakub Paul
    64% ( 29 of 45)
    1st Serve %
    68% ( 42 of 62)
    2
    Aces
    0
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    90% ( 26 of 29)
    1st Serve Won
    55% ( 23 of 42)
    63% ( 10 of 16)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 10 of 20)
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    20% ( 9 of 45)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 29 of 62)
    65
    Total Points Won
    42
    L
    6-3 6-2 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Filip Misolic
    Player
    Jakub Paul
    66% ( 43 of 65)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 62 of 96)
    1
    Aces
    0
    2
    Double Faults
    0
    70% ( 30 of 43)
    1st Serve Won
    53% ( 33 of 62)
    50% ( 11 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    47% ( 16 of 34)
    27% ( 4 of 15)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    37% ( 24 of 65)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 47 of 96)
    88
    Total Points Won
    73
    L
    6-4 6-4 H2H

    Domagoj Biljesko Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Yanki Erel
    Player
    Domagoj Biljesko
    64% ( 38 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    46% ( 31 of 68)
    3
    Aces
    2
    4
    Double Faults
    6
    76% ( 29 of 38)
    1st Serve Won
    77% ( 24 of 31)
    52% ( 11 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    32% ( 12 of 37)
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    17% ( 1 of 6)
    32% ( 19 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 32 of 68)
    72
    Total Points Won
    55
    L
    6-4 6-2 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Jan Kupcic
    Player
    Domagoj Biljesko
    65% ( 48 of 74)
    1st Serve %
    49% ( 25 of 51)
    2
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    63% ( 30 of 48)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 15 of 25)
    58% ( 15 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 13 of 26)
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    11% ( 1 of 9)
    39% ( 29 of 74)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 23 of 51)
    68
    Total Points Won
    57
    L
    6-4 6-2 H2H
    Q2
    cross
    Domagoj Biljesko
    Player
    Syl Gaxherri
    61% ( 39 of 64)
    1st Serve %
    68% ( 44 of 65)
    2
    Aces
    0
    3
    Double Faults
    1
    59% ( 23 of 39)
    1st Serve Won
    59% ( 26 of 44)
    68% ( 17 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    33% ( 7 of 21)
    31% ( 4 of 13)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    38% ( 24 of 64)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 32 of 65)
    72
    Total Points Won
    57
    W
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    Q1
    W
    6-3 7-5 H2H
    Q2
    L
    6-3 7-5 H2H
    Q1
    W
    6-4 6-0 H2H
    Q2
    L
    6-3 3-6 10-4 H2H
    Q1
    W
    6-1 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Kevin Humpfner
    Player
    Domagoj Biljesko
    59% ( 52 of 88)
    1st Serve %
    68% ( 71 of 105)
    4
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    13
    65% ( 34 of 52)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 45 of 71)
    53% ( 19 of 36)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 13 of 34)
    29% ( 5 of 17)
    Break Points Won
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    40% ( 35 of 88)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 47 of 105)
    100
    Total Points Won
    93
    L
    4-6 6-4 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    L
    2-6 6-4 10-5 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Paul & Biljesko Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Jakub Paul Paul Stats Domagoj Biljesko Biljesko
    56% (222/172) Win/Loss 53% (210/186)
    56% (494/395) Sets Win/Loss 54% (489/422)
    52% (4333/4002) Games Win/Loss 52% (4386/4006)
    0.16 Aces Per Game 0.11
    630 Aces Total 461
    0.22 Double Faults Per Game 0.31
    879 Total Double Faults 1275
    1:30:30 Average Match Time 1st Match
    451.93 Average Opponent Rank 370.58
    62% (15740/25398) 1st Serve % 58% (8653/14873)
    65% (10194/15740) 1st Serve Win % 65% (5623/8653)
    49% (4773/9668) 2nd Serve Win % 43% (2655/6220)
    45% (1262/2783) Break Points Won % (Total) 45% (711/1594)
    42% (10647/25159) Return Points Win % 42% (6210/14751)
    56% (216/388) Best of 3 Sets Win % 53% (207/390)
    100% (4/4) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
    56% (59/105) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 50% (34/68)
    47% (47/99) Deciding Set Win % 42% (52/123)
    86% (219/189) 1st Set Won, Won Match 83% (208/173)
    13% (219/29) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 16% (208/34)
    18% (175/32) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 19% (188/35)

    Other Predictions

    San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger

    flag
    20 Apr
    flag
    16:00
    Prediction

    San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    16:00
    Prediction

    San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    16:00
    Prediction

    San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...